News Feed

rss.jpg

Search


Friday
Sep032010

Bradford: more charges against EDL thugs possible as police examine CCTV footage

Police have vowed to bring the full force of the law against anyone involved in violence during a far-right demonstration in Bradford last Saturday. West Yorkshire Police are to scrutinise CCTV footage of the English Defence League's demonstration in the city centre following a string of arrests for disorder.

So far two men have been charged as police made a total of 14 arrests after outbreaks of violence at the static protest. A spokesman for West Yorkshire Police, said: "We will be reviewing the CCTV footage for the day and looking to bring justice to anyone who was causing trouble on the day."

Trouble briefly flared during the protest in Bradford's Urban Garden as police attempted to keep hundreds of EDL supporters in check. Smoke bombs, stones and bottles were thrown towards the group's opponents, forcing mounted police and officers wearing riot gear to move in.

A group of the protesters managed to break free from the police cordon, clambered over hoardings at the Westfield site and ran towards Bolton Road. A police officer suffered minor injuries during the demonstration.

Arshad Ali, a spokesman for We Are Bradford, said those found guilty of taking part in the violence should receive "significant" sentences, in line with those handed out after the Bradford riots nine years ago. He said: "Asian youths involved in the 2001 disturbances were meted out heavy long-term sentences for similar offences. We hope there will be equality and parity in the way justice will be done."

Bradford Telegraph & Argus, 3 September 2010

Thursday
Sep022010

Yes, it is libellous to brand Muslims fascists

"While there demonstrably are political Islamist movements with programmes expressly advocating totalitarian theocracy – including the destruction of leftist parties and independent trade unionism – the class dynamics involved do not fit the template of European fascism.

"If Pollard wishes effectively to oppose such movements, he should stop frothing at the mouth like the deranged neocon he has sadly become, and develop a more sober analysis of these currents rather than excoriate the moderates behind Islam Expo, who are simply acting to further dialogue between their version of Islamism and the British body politic."

Dave Osler comments on Islam Expo's libel case against Stephen Pollard and the Spectator.

Dave's Part, 2 August 2010

Thursday
Sep022010

Abe Foxman condemns Geller and Spencer's 9/11 protest as 'un-American'

"... this rally, on this very tragic day for Americans, but most tragic for those who lost their families, to use it and abuse it as a platform for bigotry, is not only tragic, it's un-American".

In an interview with Adam Serwer at The Plum Line blog, Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League condemns the SIOA's "Ground Zero mosque" demonstration on 11 September. Foxman is particularly angry that Geert Wilders will be speaking at the rally and says of Pamela Geller that "part of her agenda is to help garner support for Wilders, who is a bigot, who has a long record of anti-Muslim bigotry".

Foxman notes that the SIOA protest is part of "a campaign which is in many places directed against building mosques" and which he says exemplifies "the anti-Muslim bigotry that exists in this country". Foxman observes that this is nothing new:

"Part of the landscape, unfortunately, of America is that we're not immune to bigotry, to racism, to anti-Semitism. And part of what's out there is a bigotry to immigrants. Jews experienced it, Irish experienced it. Part of our history is there was opposition to building Catholic churches and Jewish synagogues. Now there's opposition to build mosques."

In response, Geller denounces Foxman – director of one of the leading Jewish organisations in the US – as a "groveling, simpering lapdog panting to jihadists".

But this is par for the course with Geller. In an interview with Jamie Glazov of FrontPage Magazine last December, after the Community Security Trust warned the Jewish community against supporting a Stop Islamisation of Europe protest against a new mosque in Harrow, she accused the CST of "aiding and abetting Islamic jihad and Islamic anti-Semitism".

Thursday
Sep022010

Bundesbank sacks Sarrazin

Germany's central bank today took the unprecedented step of sacking a board member after he repeatedly criticised the country's Muslim population and said "all Jews share the same gene".

In a brief statement, the Bundesbank president, Axel Weber, and four other board members said that they had been in unanimous agreement in dismissing Thilo Sarrazin, who caused an outcry when he said Muslims were sapping Germany's intellectual and economic strength.

The board's decision, taken at an extraordinary meeting, is the first such in the institution's 50-year history. All that remains is for the German president, Christian Wulff, to sanction the dismissal of Sarrazin, according to the bank's rules. Wulff has signalled he will do so, calling Sarrazin's remarks damaging to Germany's international reputation.

Guardian, 2 September 2010

Thursday
Sep022010

'The colonisation of Wales continues'

Thus the headline to a piece on the BNP website responding to reports that a disused Miners Institute building in Wrexham is to be converted into a mosque and community centre. 

The proposed conversion has already been the subject of an EDL protest and a racist Facebook page.

Those who wish to contribute to the Wrexham Mosque appeal fund can find the details here

Thursday
Sep022010

'Ground Zero mosque' protest: Geller and Spencer will be 'confiscating' placards and banners

Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer have both announced that they "respectfully request that those of you who will be attending our protest against the Ground Zero mega mosque bring American flags, not signs.... Please get the word out now. We will be confiscating signs."

"Confiscating signs"? Geller and Spencer have always portrayed themselves as uncompromising defenders of freedom of expression, notably in relation to Geert Wilders's right to incite hatred against Muslims, yet here they are suppressing the freedom of their own supporters to express opposition to the Park51 development as they see fit.

Now, why do you suppose that might be? Well, it's just a thought, but take a look at the signs above, which were brandished by participants at Stop Islamization of America's last demonstration against Park51 in June – they rather expose Geller and Spencer's pretence that SIOA's events are anything other than an excuse to whip up fear and hatred against Muslims among ignorant racists, don't they? To organise another such anti-Muslim hate-fest on the 11 September anniversary would be widely regarded as a sickening exploitation of a national tragedy, SIOA would be denounced by 9/11 families along with the mainstream media, and even Fox News might be less inclined to offer Geller a platform in future.

Of course, on the next SIOA demonstration it will no doubt be business as usual, and placards and banners bearing poisonous expressions of Islamophobic sentiment will once again be welcomed by Geller and Spencer.

It remains to be seen, however, how the mob of mindless bigots that Geller and Spencer have unleashed through their "Ground Zero mosque" campaign will react to the threat to confiscate placards and banners. I imagine that many of them won't be too keen to go along with what they will see as a capitulation to political correctness.

Already some readers of Jihad Watch are expressing their incredulity at Geller and Spencer's demand:

"WHY WILL YOU BE CONFISCATING SIGNS? Isn't that another suppression of speech? ... ISLAM MUST BE MET HEAD ON – lots of flags and 'my feelings are hurt' just won't do the trick."

"We will be confiscating signs? From my cold dead hands you will. This is America, Robert. We are not under sharia law nor are we under a police state. SHAME ON YOU for even proposing this!"

"Robert, I will bring the Dutch flag, Israeli flag or any other flag or sign I wish to bring to the 9/11 protest. This is not about you. I'm a avid reader and obviously support your and Pamela's cause, but don't ever tell us how to protest again."

"Frankly, I'm not sure I care to defend a society where a mass demonstration by the people, which is their Constitutional and moral right, must walk on eggshells."

"There is no legal authority to confiscate people's property. End of story. It is America not Arabia.... The whole point of this demo surely is that it is about opposing Shariah 'law'.... I think Robert and Pamela have maybe been spooked by CAIR. The most important thing is not to have an 'offence-free' demo but to have a demo with as many people present as possible."

Park51 opponents at a protest on 26 August, not organised by SIOA but attracting the same mob of
Islamophobes – will Geller and Spencer be able to persuade them to leave their placards at home?

Thursday
Sep022010

FPÖ faces police probe over anti-Muslim video game

Members of the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ), once the political home of the late right-wing populist politician Jörg Haider, sparked outrage this week in the form of an anti-Muslim video game released as part of a political campaign in the state of Styria, where parliamentary elections will take place at the end of September.

In the game, players must try to halt the erection of minarets and mosques using a "stop" sign. If a player fails to stop the construction, then bearded muezzins issue calls to prayer against an Alpine backdrop.

At the end of the "Bye Bye Mosque" game, which has been online since Monday, players are told: "Styria is full of minarets and mosques. So vote for Dr. Gerhard Kurzmann and the Freedom Party on September 26 so that this doesn't happen."

Members of the Green Party in the state filed a legal complaint over the game. But Kurzmann remained unmoved, saying that the game was intended to raise awareness among youth in the state about the supposed problem of minarets and mosques. At a press conference on Wednesday, Kurzmann described the controversy as a "tempest in a teapot" and, riffing off the debate in Germany, said: "We'd rather have Sarrazin than a muezzin."

On Thursday, the public prosecutor in the city of Graz, the state capital, issued a statement saying that it had opened an investigation into the game after receiving the Green Party complaint. Sedition or disparagement of religious teachings is a crime in Austria that can be punished with up to two years of imprisonment.

The president of an organization representing Muslims in Austria, Anas Shakfeh, also filed a legal complaint on Wednesday. "This is unparalleled animosity towards a religion and foreigners," he said, according to the Die Presse newspaper. The bishop of the Catholic diocese in Styria also criticized the game, saying it violated respect between religions and that it represented a danger to understanding between different faiths in society.

The game itself is actually recycled from a 2009 campaign for a referendum to ban minarets in Switzerland. So far, at least, no Ground Zero version of the game has been released.

Spiegel, 2 September 2010

See also "FPÖ boss wants minarets referendum", Austrian Independent, 31 August 2010

Thursday
Sep022010

'9/11 happened to us all' – CAIR campaign challenges anti-Muslim bigotry

A Muslim advocacy organization has released public service announcements – including one featuring a Muslim firefighter who responded on 9/11 – as part of a campaign to fight recent anti-Muslim bigotry.

"Muslim Americans were among the victims and also Muslim Americans were among the first responders," said Nihad Awad, national executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations at a Wednesday (Sept. 1) news conference at the National Press Club.

"We also should acknowledge that 9/11 hit us all hard and we should not allow those who seek political and religious division in the United States to win," Awad said.

One of the public service announcements features Hisham Tawfiq of the New York Fire Department, tearfully recalling how he learned his firefighting colleague was missing after the attacks on the Twin Towers. "I'm a New York City firefighter and I responded to 9/11 and I am Muslim," he said in the ad.

Awad was joined by other Muslim organization leaders who decried recent attacks on Muslims and protests of a proposed Islamic center near Ground Zero and mosques in other parts of the country. They urged greater local police protection of Muslims in their communities.

Huffington Post, 1 September 2010

See CAIR press release, 1 August 2010

View all the PSAs here

Update:  See also "US Islamic center to fight Islamophobia", PressTV, 2 September 2010

Thursday
Sep022010

Germany: two polls on public attitudes towards Sarrazin controversy

German public opinion is deeply split over the fate of a central banker whose disparaging comments about Muslim immigrants have triggered a heated debate on race and integration, surveys showed on Wednesday.

Over the past week and a half, Thilo Sarrazin has dominated headlines with criticism of Germany's large Muslim community, and contentious remarks asserting that Jews have a particular genetic makeup.

Chancellor Angela Merkel and a host of leading politicians have rebuked the 65-year-old Sarrazin, who has said immigrants of Turkish and Arab origin refuse to integrate, sponge off the state and make the country less intelligent on average.

Germany's Central Council of Jews and others have urged the Bundesbank to dismiss Sarrazin, but the bank said on Wednesday it had put off a decision over his fate until at least Thursday.

A survey by pollster Emnid for N24 television showed 51 percent of respondents saw no need for the Bundesbank to fire board member Sarrazin, with 32 percent taking the opposite view.

But another poll by YouGov for Bild newspaper said 42 percent considered Sarrazin no longer acceptable for the job, with 34 percent seeing him as still acceptable and 25 percent undecided. Both surveys polled around 1,000 Germans.

The Emnid poll people showed more disagreeing with than backing the views of the banker. Some 35 percent of respondents said they "rather rejected" his theories, which have been applauded by far-right parties at home and abroad, with only 30 percent taking the opposite view.

Still, 56 percent of those polled said migrants were to blame for their integration problems, while only 11 percent held the opinion that Germans were responsible for the difficulties.

Reuters, 1 September 2010

Thursday
Sep022010

New York Muslim groups support Park51, condemn promotion of 'ethnic and religious hatred'

It is "unethical, insensitive and inhumane" to oppose the planned mosque near ground zero, more than 50 leading Muslim organizations said Wednesday as they cast the intense debate as a symptom of religious intolerance in America.

Leaders of the Majlis Ash-Shura of Metropolitan New York, an Islamic leadership council that represents a broad spectrum of Muslims in the city, gathered on the steps of City Hall to issue a statement calling for a stop to religious intolerance and affirming the right of the center's developers to build two blocks north of the site of the 2001 terrorist attacks.

"We support the right of our Muslim brothers who wish to build that center there," said Imam Al Amin Abdul Latif, president of the Majlis Ash-Shura. "However, the bigger issue and the broader issue is the issue of ethnic and religious hatred being spread by groups trying to stop the building of mosques and Islamic institutions across the country."

This is the first time that the council as a body has spoken out on the weeks-old debate over the proposed center. "When the issue became hotter and hotter, and people made more statements against the mosques, then we decided to get involved in it," said Syed Sajid Husain, secretary general of the council. He said the process of bringing together the leaders to agree on a statement also took a handful of meetings.

Leaders of the council said they were calling attention to what they claimed was an anti-Islamic climate, and that the development of a center near ground zero is simply one example.

They also cited a suspicious fire that damaged construction equipment at the site of a future mosque in Tennessee that is being investigated by the FBI, and the successful opposition to the proposed conversion of a property owned by a Catholic Church into a mosque and community center on Staten Island, a New York City borough off the southern tip of Manhattan.

Islamic leaders on Wednesday said they would support a move to another location, if that's what the imam and his supporters choose to do. But they emphasized that Muslims also were killed in the terrorist attacks and were first responders.

"We declare unethical, insensitive and inhumane, the notion that our co-religionists are not entitled to the respect of a place of worship according to their faith, near the location where men and women of our religion worked, lived and died – just like other people," the group's statement said in part.

The group is not associated with the planned Islamic center but is representative of a significant number of New York Muslim leaders.

Associated Press, 1 September 2010

See also ABNA, 2 September 2010