Islamophobia Watch

Yusuf Smith responds to Charles Moore's recent Centre for Policy Studies lecture "How to beat the Scargills of Islam".

Indigo Jo Blogs, 23 March 2008

It's also worth noting the following excerpt from Moore's ignorant lecture: "Phoney Muslim moderates, beloved of the media, are a great feature of our age. Look at Tariq Ramadan, for example, lionised at Oxford while considered so extreme in France that he found it easier to leave and work here." As we've pointed out repeatedly, anyone who regards Professor Ramadan as an extremist has completely lost the plot. And who represents Moore's idea of a "moderate"? Predictably, it's Melanie Phillips' favourite Muslim, Ed Husain.

As the premiere of the long-awaited Koran film by far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders nears, it's not uncommon to hear Muslims call for some way to censor what they expect to be a blistering condemnation of their faith. But not all see the film – now expected to be broadcast by the end of this month – as an opportunity to revive the polarisation of the Prophet Mohammad cartoons clash in 2006, when freedom of expression and respect for faith were presented as implacable opposites.

Tariq Ramadan, one of Europe's most prominent Muslim intellectuals, has never shied from confronting the critics of his faith. But his approach to the Wilders film aims to avoid a repeat of the cartoons controversy. At a recent conference in Sweden, he told Reuters that people could not be prevented from publishing material like the Wilders film and the Danish newspaper cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad that triggered protests across the Muslim world. Ramadan went on: "My advice (to Muslims) is take an intellectual critical distance towards this. Say 'we don't like it' but go ahead and just ignore it."

Reuters blogs, 17 March 2008

On the principle of "we read this reactionary crap so you don't have to", Islamophobia Watch has invested in a copy of Brother Tariq, the English language edition of Caroline Fourest's attack on Tariq Ramadan, recently published by the right-wing Tory think-tank the Social Affairs Unit.

The book's jacket features accolades from Peter Tatchell and Joan Smith. Tatchell poses the rhetorical question: "Is Tariq Ramadan an Islamic liberal or a clever Islamist strategist who uses the language of liberalism to disguise a fundamentalist agenda?" Fourest's book, of course, comes down firmly in favour of the latter, and in recommending it Tatchell clearly does too. Smith, for her part, tells us that "political Islam, catalogued in this book in forensic detail, loathes the modern world" and recommends Fourest's anti-Ramadan polemic as "an essential guide to decoding Islamist rhetoric, exposing the political project which lies behind contrived controversies such as the veil".

Click to read more ...

"Fourest has rendered an invaluable service. She demonstrates with great skill that Ramadan is a dangerous radical who, far from modernizing Islam, is in fact attempting to Islamize modernity."

Ibn Warraq reviews Caroline Fourest's book Brother Tariq: The Doublespeak of Tariq Ramadan.

City Journal, 29 February 2008

Note that this English language edition of Fourest's Frère Tariq is published in the UK by the right-wing think-tank the Social Affairs Unit and features an introduction by Denis MacShane.

See also The Australian for the controversy over Tariq Ramadan's current visit to Australia.

Update: The Australian has commissioned Mad Melanie Phillips to deliver a characteristic rant under the headline "Master of Islamist doublespeak", which warns the people of Australia that Professor Ramadan is "probably the most dangerous Islamist in the Western world"!

See also "MP warns scholar on racist messages".

"Tariq Ramadan differs a bit from militant Islam, at least in method, although not in the final outcome; both are all about Islamic dominance. Tariq Ramadan opposes the Muslims' use of violence in Europe because in the long run violence might be devastating to the prospect of Euroislam.... Euroislam is the vision of Islam’s religious and political dominance over Europe."

Kirsten Sarauw in the Kristeligt Dagblad, 11 January 2008

OTTAWA – A pervasive bias exists in the way Islam is studied in the West, says a prominent Muslim thinker, who is calling for sweeping changes to the way Islamic studies are taught in universities.

Tariq Ramadan, a visiting professor at Oxford University and one of Europe's leading intellectuals on Islam, argues that despite a growing interest in the field, the scholarly pursuit of Islam is driven not by an interest in theology, but by fear and an obsession with the struggle against terrorism.

In the latest issue of the Canadian journal Academic Matters, Ramadan chastises universities for their "carefully orchestrated infatuation" with Islamic studies. He says the current academic focus on terrorism reduces the richness of Islamic theology into political ideology.

"The study of religious thought proper (of the theology, of its premises, its internal complexities and its development) has been relegated to a subsidiary position," he writes. "Universities in the West must seek the kind of knowledge of other civilizations and cultures – particularly that of Islam – that is driven neither by ideological agendas nor collective fears." What's "cruelly lacking," Ramadan argues, is an objective study of Islamic law, legal scholars and philosophers as well as a "historical and critical approach to Islamic history and thought."

He goes on to criticize western scholars for ignoring the body of "fresh, compelling, audacious critical thought" emerging from contemporary Muslim societies, which are often eclipsed by controversies surrounding sharia law or the role of women. "There is a deep-down, deliberate process of evolution under way in every Islamic society in the world," writes Ramadan. "Far from rushing to conclusions, far from populist, ideological speech, the academic world must take this process seriously, study it, and present its outlines and implications."

Ottawa Citizen, 22 December 2007

Tariq Ramadan replies to Ayaan Hirsi Ali's recent article in the New York Times.

International Herald Tribune, 16 December 2007

The welcome campaign launched by the prominent Christian Democrat and former trade unionist Doekle Terpstra against anti-Muslim racist Geert Wilders has been roundly denounced by the Right.

At Pipeline News Bella Rabinowitz (who finds it significant that the campaign is supported by "the ultra-left Amnesty International") denounces Terpstra's initiative as an attempt to deny freedom of speech to Geert Wilders and claims that "the assault on Wilders is reminiscent of the hysteria which led to the assassination of another Dutch politician, Pim Fortuyn".

Over at the Brussels Journal Thomas Landen opines: "Last month one of Holland’s most prestigious institutes, the University of Leiden, appointed the Islamist ideologue Tariq Ramadan to the post of professor of Islamology. Mr Ramadan is at least as controversial as Mr Wilders. One wonders why Mr Terpstra, contrary to Mr Wilders, did not oppose Mr Ramadan's appointment. Mr Terpstra did not make any effort to say 'Tariq Ramadan is evil, and has to be stopped'. Why has no-one heard him call upon his countrymen 'to rise in order to stop Ramadan'?"

So says Denis MacShane, who continues his campaign against Islamism in general and Tariq Ramadan in particular.

Observer, 11 November 2007

Diana Johnstone reviews Bernard-Henri Lévy's new book Ce grand cadavre à la renverse. According to BHL there is, Johnstone writes, "a new 'fascist' enemy to combat: 'Islamofascism' or, as he prefers to call it, 'Fascislamism'." This is evidently a fairly broad category, as BHL identifies Fascislamism "even in the relatively moderate positions of Tariq Ramadan, for instance, not to mention veiled women and Muslims who object to cartoons portraying the prophet Mohamed as a terrorist bomber."

Counterpunch, 1 November 2007